Hi there,
Even second digit(s) kernels are stable, odd second digit(s)
kernels are unstable or development kernels, use at your own risk. I've
found no problems with 2.2.13, others may know different. Don't use 2.3.x
unless you want bleeding edge and are prepared to suffer the consequences.
You can ftp kernels from 'ftp.kernel.org'
Hope this helps...
Regards JohnG
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
_/ John Gould _/
_/ Senior Systems Support Engineer _/
_/ Power Innovations Limited _/
_/ Manton Lane, Bedford. MK41 7BJ, England _/
_/ PGP - Public key available _/
_/ email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] _/
_/ Tel: +44 1234 223002 Fax: +44 1234 223000 _/
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, Micha Feigin wrote:
> I was wondering which is the stablest 2.2 kernel curently
> I am never shure if it is the even or uneven numbers ( is it 2.2.13 or
> 2.2.14 ?)
> I am using kernel 2.2.9 , is it worth the update?
>
> also, by what name does the 2.3 kernels go? are they available under
> debian, and is it a new version after potato ( I am a bit out of date ).
>
> Thanx
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
>
>
