On Wed, 16 Feb 2000, Phil Brutsche wrote: pbruts >> I was wondering which is the stablest 2.2 kernel curently pbruts > pbruts >2.2.14 pbruts > pbruts >> I am never shure if it is the even or uneven numbers ( is it 2.2.13 or pbruts >> 2.2.14 ?) pbruts > pbruts >You need to worry about the middle of the three being even - ie 2.0.x and pbruts >2.2.x are considered extremely stable; 2.1.x and 2.3.x are considered pbruts >'unstable' ie don't trust 'em to work right when you need them. pbruts > pbruts >> I am using kernel 2.2.9 , is it worth the update? pbruts > pbruts >Yes.
unless there really is something specific in the new kernel i wouldn't upgrade unless you're feeling adventerous. the highest kernels i run on production machines is 2.2.10 it'll be a good 6 months i think before i choose a newer kernel rev.(my most important ones still use 2.0) 2.2.9 -> 2.2.10 would be a good upgrade probably though. i have noticed nothing worth while in anything past 2.2.10(feature wise or stability wise, infact .11 -> .13 had some pretty serious problems for some users) nate ----------------------------------------[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]-- Vice President Network Operations http://www.firetrail.com/ Firetrail Internet Services Limited http://www.aphroland.org/ Everett, WA 425-348-7336 http://www.linuxpowered.net/ Powered By: http://comedy.aphroland.org/ Debian 2.1 Linux 2.0.36 SMP http://yahoo.aphroland.org/ -----------------------------------------[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]-- 3:46pm up 181 days, 4:04, 1 user, load average: 1.02, 1.04, 1.02
