El dom, 14 de nov de 1999, a las 05:28:44 +0200, Martin Fluch dijo: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > On Sun, 14 Nov 1999, Pollywog wrote: > > > There could be a problem with doing it that way, if you are a KDE user. > > I use KDE, so I installed two versions of QT, from source. That allows me > > to > > use KDE and only use QT 2.x to build Licq, without affecting KDE. > > Also they seem to be installable simultaneous?
Yes, I already solved the problem by installing libqt2, and then I installed libqt1g which I needed for qweb 1.3-3.1 Both conflict with qt1. No matter the reason for dropping qt1g for libqt1g, it works nice but leads to confusion as many packages in unstable still require it. > (I must admit, that I don't use KDE. But why should this be a problem?) I guess that some KDE versions around are still using qt1g, so he wouldn't be able to install libqt2 without conflicts. BTW, has anyone tried a gnome apt-get upgrade? :-) -- Horacio Anno MMDCCLII ad Urbe condita mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ Spain ~Spanje ~ Spanien -------------------------------------------------------------------- Key fingerprint = F4EE AE5E 2F01 0DB3 62F2 A9F4 AD31 7093 4233 7AE6
