On Thu, Aug 26, 1999 at 11:22:02PM -0700, Eric G . Miller wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 1999 at 12:22:23AM -0500, Brad wrote: > | I've always used, for example, "--revision=2.2.12-hostname.1" because > | dselect always wanted to replace my custom kernels with the stock ones > | once that version went up on the mirrors if i used just "custom.1"... > | > | Anyway, 2.2.12-* is the proper version format ;) > > I haven't had this problem of dselect trying to replace kernels with a > "custom.n.n" in the name. My kernels always come out with the version > number before the custom part "kernel-image-2.2.10_custom.1.9_i386.deb". > Maybe this reflects changes in dselect and make-kpkg?
I've seen it happen once. I think it was with a kernel-image which used epochs. The kernel-package documentation recommends using epochs to avoid this: make-kpkg --revision=1:custom.1.0 kernel_image. Bob -- Bob Nielsen Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tucson, AZ AMPRnet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DM42nh http://www.primenet.com/~nielsen
