If I was looking for a good word processor to run on a small laptop system that has to contain Linux, X and all within 320 Meg, would you recommend emacs or is there something better? David
-----Message d'origine----- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: lundi 12 avril 1999 19:26 À: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-user@lists.debian.org Objet: Re: Emacs In a message dated 4/12/99 11:39:36 AM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > I think my recommendation as far as xemacs vs emacs goes is that, for > > a new emacs user, xemacs offers that one advantage of GUIs -- little > > pull down menus that help you use the editor before you learn all the > > esoteric keystrokes. Once you've taken advantage of that for a bit > > using xemacs -nw (no windows) on a terminal is just fine. > Are there any advantages or disadvantages to using xemacs on a terminal? > FYI - Emacs20 under X also provides these drop down menus. -Jay -- Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
