http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/voelker/ntemacs.html
> -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Harran [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, April 12, 1999 11:11 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Debian User Group > Subject: Re: Emacs > > Do you mean that you can run emacs in (MS) Windows. If so, could you > please tell me where to find the windows version. > > Cheers > Rich > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > I think my recommendation as far as xemacs vs emacs goes is that, for > > a new emacs user, xemacs offers that one advantage of GUIs -- little > > pull down menus that help you use the editor before you learn all the > > esoteric keystrokes. Once you've taken advantage of that for a bit > > using xemacs -nw (no windows) on a terminal is just fine. > > > > I've never tried to learn vi. I admit, if you just want to create a > > file of a couple lines in your administration of your box, starting > > x/emacs may seem like overkill. I always use > > > > $ echo "whatever needs\nto go here" > into.the.new.file > > > > I think the best part about emacs is that you can run it on windows -- > > and using it to navigate the file structure, delete, rename, and move > > files is simply a *joy* (well, compared to being stuck in windows in > > the first place). > > > > My only current complaint about emacs is more a complaint about > > screen. I'm going nuts not being able to use ^a to get to the > > beginning of a line..... If anyone uses emacs with screen, i'd love a > > chance to see your .screenrc. > > > > Cheerios, > > > > judith > > > > -- > > Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < > /dev/null
