On Wed, Mar 24, 1999 at 10:53:12PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > It wasn't that long ago (a few months?) that Slackware released 3.6 (2.0.35) > ... isn't it two short for a new release?
Depends. Both Red Hat and Slackware have had new versions out the door
in 2 months, and new versious out in 7 months.
> *(actually, I'm asking here, not stating anything at all)*
Well, as I said, I've got 2.2.1 running on my main machine with no
problems that I see. Only reason 2.2.3 isn't in there is because I don't
feel like killing my...
# Uptime | System Boot up
----------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
-> 1 42 days, 13:03:52 | Linux 2.2.1 Wed Feb 10 01:03:44 1999
----------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
...42 day uptime when I am going to move later in the month. When I
move I'll recompile to 2.2.3 and start the clock over. :)
> Sorry to disagree here, but that sounds more like an argument for windoze vs
> debian (or any other linux), rather than debian vs slackware.
I don't know of too many Slackware machines which are still in
production use. Red Hat and Debian have seemed to take over that role. I
may be wrong, however.
--
Steve C. Lamb | Opinions expressed by me are not my
http://www.calweb.com/~morpheus | employer's. They hired me for my
ICQ: 5107343 | skills and labor, not my opinions!
---------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
pgpaW6v2dNgbU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
