Steve Lamb dixit: > home I run my Laptop on Debian 2.1, my "main" machine on some portions of > Potato. My main machine runs kernel 2.2.1, my laptop 2.0.34. Functionally, > they are identical to one another. I telnet in, I run X aps, no big deal. > They work. I really can't tell the difference between the 2.2.1 machine and > the 2.0.34 machine based on that alone.
It wasn't that long ago (a few months?) that Slackware released 3.6 (2.0.35) ... isn't it two short for a new release? If it's about getting a distro with the latest kernel release, then it may be a matter of just downloading it from kernel.org and compiling it ... what am I missing anything here? Else, taking time for a distribution to solidly be built around a new kernel version is the other choice. *(actually, I'm asking here, not stating anything at all)* > Sure, for the "latest and greatest" jockies, Slackware will beat Debian. > For people who live in the real world and use their machines as more than > power toys and status symbols, I don't think so. Sorry to disagree here, but that sounds more like an argument for windoze vs debian (or any other linux), rather than debian vs slackware. Horacio. -- Claves - GnuPG/PGP - Keys : http://www.rediris.es/cert/keyserver o/or Envía un mensaje vacío a [EMAIL PROTECTED] con la línea de asunto: Send a blank message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject line: Tipo de Clave/Key Type Asunto:/Subject: DSA/ElGamal fetch dsa/elgamal DSS/Diffie-Hellman fetch dh/dss RSA fetch rsa
pgpoVPawETQUN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
