Hi,
>>"Peter" == Peter Prohaska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> The idea of keeping up a list of files from non-free which can
Peter> be burnt on CD without hesitating would be a very good
Peter> thing. It might be just a directory with symlinks to packages
Peter> in non-free. So there would not be too much to change. Sure, it
Peter> is a lot of work, but if you want to make a debian archive out
Peter> of a program, you have to read the License anyway. So adding a
Peter> symlink should be an acceptable effort, not? If you want to
Peter> distribute debian, and have to go through every licence in
Peter> non-free... wouldn't you drop non-free?
I do not wish to discourage anyone from doing this, but please
bear in mind that anyone providing a list of ``OK'' packages
from non-free may be opeining themselves up to legal liability while
doing so.
I certainly would prefer the Debian project itself not pass
these judgements on non-free packages unless we had legal advice.
manoj
who values his new house too much to even touch this with a ten foot pole
--
"Perhaps I am flogging a straw herring in mid-stream, but in the
light of what is known about the ubiquity of security
vulnerabilities, it seems vastly too dangerous for university folks
to run with their heads in the sand." Peter G. Neumann, RISKS
moderator, about the Internet virus
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
