> > Yes, the printer works fine in Windows 95. I have an old Epson LQ 510, > also. > I'll try hooking that up later and see if that helps. Though I guess > if Linux isn't even seeing the parallel port it shouldn't matter. > > If it isn't seeing the parallel port now, why did it say it captured the > lp1 when I tried loading the lp module with the rescue disk? I never > tried printing while using the rescue disk. Should I switch to the shell > and try redirecting to lp1 while using the rescue disk? > > You can try both of these things. If either of them make a > difference, then it's an interesting data point that would help us > figure out what's wrong. But I really can't think why they'd make a > difference. > > Are you using the default kernel or a kernel that you compiled yourself? > I am using the default bo kernel.
-- Jim Crumley | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- E-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble? E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
