> That means that the driver doesn't think you have any parallel ports. > Are the parallel ports enabled in the BIOS? Do you have any other > OSes that the parallel ports work in? > Yes, the printer works fine in Windows 95. I have an old Epson LQ 510, also. I'll try hooking that up later and see if that helps. Though I guess if Linux isn't even seeing the parallel port it shouldn't matter.
If it isn't seeing the parallel port now, why did it say it captured the lp1 when I tried loading the lp module with the rescue disk? I never tried printing while using the rescue disk. Should I switch to the shell and try redirecting to lp1 while using the rescue disk? You can try both of these things. If either of them make a difference, then it's an interesting data point that would help us figure out what's wrong. But I really can't think why they'd make a difference. Are you using the default kernel or a kernel that you compiled yourself? -- E-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble? E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
