Tim Thomson wrote: > > A friend of mine asked me if X-win was more efficient than Win95 on the > same system? > > I said it would probably be better for somethings, and maybe slower than > others, but I wasn't sure - so I though to ask you people. > > Anyone done any benchmarks??? >
This is not a benchmark by any means but, on my 486/33 with 32M of RAM, when booted to Linux (or FreeBSD for that matter) I find X to be more responsive than Win95 with it's windowing system. By "more responsive" I mean that I find myself less distracted by the speed at which I can move, resize and open windows and better able to concentrate on the task at hand. Keith -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
