David Stern wrote: > I've also noticed that since the last Enlightenment release, some of > the WM and AStep crowd are now switching to E!. I think this was > partially because the last release was a major in the development > cycle, but also partially due to redhat hiring E!'s author, which was > regarded as a hopeful sign that easier configuration would not be far > off. I've heard that the performance and stability is now tolerable, > but haven't heard anything about it's longstanding functionally > challenged condition. E! still uses quite a bit of memory and cpu > grunt, too. I guess it's supposed to look so good it doesn't matter. > There are several new, unique, attractive desktop accompaniments for E! > now, also. > > David
I plan on running E only when I attain more CPU power and a better video card than the one I currently have. Afterstep has done me ok on this particular configuration.. so it's sad to hear that development is at a stand-still. However if WM get some stable stuff out there, I might switch... right now I'm pondering WM and the KDE. KDE looks like it could be a very nice integrated desktop (if they pull off all those apps)... Anyways.. nice bouncing these ideas off of you.. -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
