Aldrin L. M. Leal wrote: > > I was looking around, haven't found, but i think it's a good > idea to promote some effort to create a Linux sort of certified > professional. Like, "Certified Linux Admin", "Programmer", "User", > "Manager", and so forth... the first great advantage occurs when big > business (the usual IBM client) wants to go down to linux. By having a > certification, you provide rules for choosing an expert, like Novell > and > Microsoft do. > > Does anybody want to discuss this? :] > Sure,
Most of the time, certification is a great way for the vendor to make an extra buck. I've found in the M$ world that scores on a multiple-guess test that has been heavly coached is a _poor_ indicator real-world results. It seems that the portfolio of recient projects usually out-weighs the certification. Its the same reason that fresh grads have fewing fun options. Most advertisments are looking for experiance and really want results. However, maybe the commercial software world should consider a POSIX certification instead. The reasoning I'd provide for this instead of more specific is that those specifics are fairly easly found by individuals with enough initiative to RTFM (my def: Read The _Fine_ Manual). Even if there is only enough initiative to ask the group on a Linux or Debian list, there is usually sufficient quick turn-around to support a 'flavor novice.' Just my view from Atlanta. L8r -- Greg. -- Greg Vence | Debian GNU Linux KH2EA/4 | Diamond 2000 (7npw 4cpw) [EMAIL PROTECTED] | There is time for what's important -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
