On Fri, 22 Nov 1996, Bruce Perens wrote: > Yes. However, we still might look askance at Qt due to the other licensing > terms, which are more restrictive than the GPL, especially since V (another > C++ GUI) is under the GPL. > > Please understand I'm not making a technical criticisim. I just wish they > would GPL the darned thing and leave it at that.
They may be afraid of the situation that some other authors run into with freely distributable packages. For example, Knuth's TeX package had some of the fonts changed by someone other than the author. While the Knuth does not care if the fonts are modified, he really cares that the modified fonts were of the same name as his fonts. The result of the changed fonts were documents that looked different on different installations of TeX (depending on whether the site got the original fonts or not). This is very undesirable from the author's point of view, as he put considerable effort into ensuring that documents produced with TeX look the same regardless of the hardware used (within physical limits). While the Qt authors may have different concerns than Knuth does over TeX, the idea may be the same: modified versions may reflect badly on Troll Tech. -- William Burrow -- Fredericton Area Network, New Brunswick, Canada Copyright 1996 William Burrow The above is pure speculation. -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
