Andrea Vettorello wrote:

On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 08:58:30 -0500, Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Marc Demlenne wrote:


I'm using the Kernel 2.6.8
I do not have SCSI emulation configured for this because I was under the
impression that it was no longer required for the 2.6 kernel.



Hi,

Got the same problem. When recompiling my 2.6 for the first time, i
switched off SCSI emulation as it's said not to be needed any more.

But xcdroast still _does_ need SCSI emulation. If you take a look on
their site, you'll see :

"I had several reports that the last 2.6.x kernel broke CD-Writing
using the ATAPI driver. Don't update if you want to continue to use
X-CD-Roast, or switch back to SCSI-emulation."

So there's no other solution ! You still use scsi emulation, even with
2.6, or yuou take smthg else to burn your CD.

By the way, i post another question... What's the best way to burn
CD's under Linux ? xcdroast used to be a must, but doesn't seem to be
well maintained any more, does it ? Maybe it's still a must anyway ?

Another way to burn is to do this manually, on console line. Not the
easiest way, but a reliable one !
You can take a look at CD-Burning howto, it's not so difficult !

Good luck !




I was able to get the scsi emulation turned back on easily enough.  And
it did burn one CD, the one I needed.  But now I need to access the
stupid thing and I have no idea which device it really is.
sr1 (according to dmesg) isn't it
hdc isn't it
sg0 isn't it
sg1 isn't it

I wish to god someone would come up with a better way of managing these
devices.  It's one thing to know what device branch it's under, it's
another to have 169 possibilities under that branch with most of them
dead ends.

Very frustrated.

I'll try upgrading to 2.6.9 and removing all the SCSI stuff for now.
I need to access the disk more than anything right now.




Is an IDE CD writer?


If yes, try to put manually in xcdrecord config the device name using
the cdrecord naming scheme that you find with "cdrecord dev=ATA
-scanbus" or using the default IDE scheme, i.e. what usually you find
on dmesg. Something like "/dev/hdc" if the writer is using the first
channel (master?) of the second IDE interface.



This brings up another point.  How are you supposed to know what USB
device is assigned to a USB storage device?  My only solution is to plug
it in and watch the logs.  Are there any better alternatives?





Are you using udev/hal? In this case you can put a rule in /etc/udev/rules.d, you should find the details in the udev documentation.


Andrea




I hate to admit this, but the /dev system is basically unusable to the newbie, or oldie for that matter. If you would like the "Unix" world without the hassle, take a look at Apple OSX 10.2 or OSX 10.3. I know, I know - but, it does work and work everytime. New device, just plug it in. It is not cheap! But, the time you save will generally equal out. And, you get the command line when you want to explore. Just another avenue. There is also Fedora Core 3, Mandrake, FreeBSD, OpenBSD.
Fedora Core 3 and Mandrake are easiest with FreeBSD and OpenBSD presenting the same complications you are currently dealing with. Flexability and changeability come at a cost, mainly the time required to learn the system and its unique requirements.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Reply via email to