Re: Limiting Disck Cache

[Nate Duehr]

Ivan Garcia wrote:
--- Nate Duehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: 
 

Steve Lamb wrote:
   

* A machine whose sole purpose is to host UMLs
     

being the one case I can 
   

think
of that would require the OS to not use cache. 
     

This is because the UMLs
   

themselves are caching the files thus there is no
     

need for the host OS to
   

cache the same files.
     

Uggh... I ran into that when experimenting with
UML's.  Good lord, it 
hurt performance badly.
   

Does it mean that it's posible?
So how does it work?
 

In our particular case, we found that the UML's were unnecessary for our 
application (we were sharing a box amongst multiple people/admins and 
wanted to keep everyone separated from each other, but we found we could 
all work together).

So we yanked the UML's and just went with a single shared box and some 
rules about who could change what.

Nate
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]