On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 09:04:34PM +0100, Wim De Smet wrote: > This is true, but if you only use aptitude it's a minor problem (eg. > you can probably not even set a package on hold without the curses > interface).
Oh? Try reading aptitude's man page. The question isn't whether aptitude is feature-complete (it is), but whether it implements those features in a way compatible with the rest of the toolchain (it doesn't). I wouldn't care, not in the least, what aptitude did... if it wasn't being pushed as a be-all-end-all tool. Otherwise it'd be as ignorable as synaptic is. -- Marc Wilson | No matter where I go, the place is always called [EMAIL PROTECTED] | "here". -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
