On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 11:45:10AM +0000, Dave Ewart wrote: > I disagree. Woody is perfectly usable for most purposes. I accept > there may be some instances where features provided by newer versions of > some software is essential, but many new versions can be backported.
At which point it really isn't Woody any more. -- Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabootu's Minister of Proofreading http://www.jabootu.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
