On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 11:13:37 -0500, Michael Satterwhite wrote: > I've been watching the various discussions on this, and note that most > experienced types think that the unstable distribution is better than > the testing distribution. This leads me to one more question / > observation
It happened in Sarge/testing when KDE 3.1 was entering. I haven't had any "problems" with unstable (current) that I didn't have with testing (both Woody and Sarge)... ... with one exception: I tried installing GNOME 2.0 from Ximian onto a new Woody/testing system and I could neither get it to work nor downgrade to GNOME 1.4. > How does one recover from something like this short of doing a reload? * Buddha enlightenment * Expert assistance * Educated guesses * Trial and error > Other than this, the arguments for the unstable over testing seem valid. I'm convinced; also, my combination of "expert assistance", "educated guesses" and "trial and error" have corrected the few things that have gone wrong. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
