Intéressant merci du retour. Etonnant car on voit ce dépôt presque partout quand il s'agit d'avoir une version à jour de ffmpeg ou d'un navigateur avec flash.
Le 24/10/2018 à 15:33, Pierre Frenkiel a écrit : > On Wed, 24 Oct 2018, Wallace wrote: > >> Je ne connais pas ces logiciels mais je sais que la partie multimedia >> est très bien gérée par http://www.deb-multimedia.org/ >> > attention, c'est dangereux! > voici un extrait de https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/FAQ > > 2.5. There is 'Debian Multimedia Maintainers' and > 'deb-multimedia.org'. So > what's the difference? 'Debian Multimedia Maintainers' is the team > behind > the packaging of multimedia related packages distributed with Debian. In > other words, 'Debian Multimedia Maintainers' is us. > > 'deb-multimedia.org' (aka 'dmo' or 'd-m.o', formerly > 'debian-multimedia.org') is a site that offers a repository of multimedia > packages as well. That site is maintained by an individual that is not > part of this team. > > 2.5.1. freedom A key difference between the 'deb-multimedia.org' and our > team is that we strive to maintain packages that are considered DFSG free > or get them to a state where they become DFSG free. Moreover, we aim at > proper integration of programs into the Debian system. In contrast to > official Debian packages, many packages from 'deb-multimedia.org' are > licensed under non-free terms that limit their use and are not freely > redistributable. > > 2.5.2. versioning To distinguish between our official packages and > packages > from d-m.o, d-m.o adds an 'epoch' to the version number and uses a > specific > revision counter. This means that once you installed a version from > d-m.o, > package management software will always consider that version newer than > the official package - even when the official package is in actual fact > a newer version (but without the epoch). > > 2.6. Does the team coordinate package maintenance with dmo? No. There > is no such coordination with the team and anyone in dmo. There have been > attempts to coordinate package maintenance with dmo, but the maintainer > of dmo has consistently expressed no interest in coordinating package > maintenance with anyone in the team. > > 2.8. Well, isn't deb-multimedia.org an official part of Debian? This is > a common misconception in regards to what deb-multimedia.org is. Although > dmo is run by a Debian Developer and used to make use of the word > "Debian" > and the Debian trademark, dmo is in fact not a part of Debian or > affiliated > with Debian in any way. The fund-raising that happens there does not go > towards Debian. As far as we understand it, dmo is maintained by only > two people, neither of whom are a part of this team. > > Cordialement,
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
