On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 1:34 PM, adrelanos wrote: > I am wondering how excited the apt developers would be about adding a > bash script to their app. I'll see how far I get and contact them when > there is something to talk about.
I suppose POSIX shell would be preferable. > Imagine for a moment, you would like my implementation... Then, would > you suppose to activate this by default in Debian? Not sure, but the feature should at least be present even if it is disabled by default... > In that case, can the keyservers handle the load from the mass of Debian > and its derivatives users? Should we ask keyserver operators or on gnupg > mailing list if that is a fine idea? Zero idea, best ask indeed. > What PPAs you're using isn't a secret anyway, since apt traffic isn't > encrypted. If you want to hide which PPAs you're using and which signing > keys you're refreshing, I think it's best to route all that traffic over > Tor. I don't understand the benefit in selectively routing key fetches > of signing keys over Tor while leaving the rest in the clear. That makes sense. >> Add a system daemon for parcimonie > > But parcimonie already has a system daemon? AFAICT it only has a per-user daemon. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAKTje6EDS5OVnT=eo7su_zxpvjjkyzxo3xjoxkg46uznwz2...@mail.gmail.com
