On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 5:55 PM, intrigeri wrote: > As the author of parcimonie, I can only agree it would be great if > someone took it over and made it more lightweight.
I was looking at the riseup OpenPGP best practices document and I noticed that someone had added a link to a bash reimplementation. The author claims it has an advantage over parcimonie of using unique Tor circuits for each key fetch. Personally I don't think bash is the appropriate language to implement this though. https://github.com/EtiennePerot/parcimonie.sh > Are there specific pieces of the implementation that seem too complex > to you, or any available option that could be dropped in your opinion? The most valuable thing that could improve parcimonie would be to include an implementation of the concept in GnuPG itself. The only problem with that would be the UI parts but those could be kept separated. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAKTje6F4Cwh3=A3oYjjdWxYcZo4F1jdDZa2mtK7=spo+vny...@mail.gmail.com
