CaT wrote: > On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 07:47:31AM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: >> On jeu, 2008-05-15 at 23:38 +0200, Steffen Schulz wrote: >> > or what its worth...I see 3.5 problems that accumulated into this >> > mess: >> > >> > - OpenSSL is complex and critical but the code is little documented. >> > Code pieces like the ones in question should have warning-labels >> > printed all over them and a distinguished place and interface. >> >> There was a #ifndef PURIFY just before the instruction commented by #if >> 0. > > /* Uninitialised memory used intentionally to add entropy */ > > That, I believe, speaks volumes. > > #ifndef PURIFY says very little. > > Most, if not all languages provide the ability to enter in comments for > a reason.
Even better, the OTHER call to MD_Update(&m,buf,j) -- the *really important* one occurring around line 247 that didn't have #ifndef PURIFY -- really should have had some comment like: /* Add content of passed-in buffer to PRNG to supply entropy */ best regards, -- Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> WWW: http://www.starplot.org/ WWW: http://people.debian.org/~kmccarty/ GPG: public key ID 4F83C751
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
