Hi, FTP-master asked me on irc to get permission from you (debian-security) for splitting up ia32-libs into multiple source packages before going any further.
The ia32-libs package provides 32bit i486 legacy support for amd64 and ia64 so that users can run software that is only available in 32bit. Among others this includes rar, wine, acrobat reader, mplayer with windows dlls (sometimes you still need those), wine, google earth, skipe, znes. According to popcon 94% of the amd64/ia64 users have ia32-libs installed so the demand for 32bit support is still high. We, the ia32-libs team, plan to split up ia32-libs into multiple source packages because it has become too big to keep track of it all. Too name some numbers we currently have: ia32-libs contains 116 debs from 106 sources and ia32-libs-gtk contains 19 debs from 15 sources and more have been requested to support additional software. In total this makes 440MiB: -rw-r--r-- 1 mrvn mrvn 499 Apr 25 02:12 ia32-libs_2.4.dsc -rw-r--r-- 1 mrvn mrvn 319M Apr 25 02:12 ia32-libs_2.4.tar.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 mrvn mrvn 28M Apr 25 02:20 ia32-libs_2.4_amd64.deb -rw-r--r-- 1 mrvn mrvn 32M Apr 25 02:13 ia32-libs_2.4_ia64.deb -rw-r--r-- 1 mrvn mrvn 2.6M Apr 25 02:13 ia32-libs-dev_2.4_ia64.deb -rw-r--r-- 1 mrvn mrvn 671 Apr 24 15:59 ia32-libs-gtk_2.2.dsc -rw-r--r-- 1 mrvn mrvn 50M Apr 24 15:58 ia32-libs-gtk_2.2.tar.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 mrvn mrvn 4.2M Apr 24 15:58 ia32-libs-gtk_2.2_amd64.deb -rw-r--r-- 1 mrvn mrvn 4.2M Apr 28 01:43 ia32-libs-gtk_2.2_ia64.deb There is currently (for Lenny at least) no way around having dummy packages that contain source and precompiled debs and we have to live with that ugliness for now. This mail isn't about that. This mail is about how many dummy packages we have. Our plan is to have one dummy package per source package. The dummy package have a "ia32-" prefix before their original name to keep the namespaces separate. The depends, provides, replaces, conflicts Fields as well as the shlibs and symbols files are adjusted to match. Advantages: - trivial to check if the ia32-* package is up to date - small packages allowing for a quick update/test/upload cycle - we can keep in sync with unstable and testing - no 440MiB upload to update a 1MiB library - correct dependencies safeguarding the testing transition and updates - bug-reports go to the individual package and not all pile onto ia32-libs - maintainer, if willing, can maintain the ia32-libfoo package themself ensuring simultaneous updates Disadvantages: - 120 source packages instead of 2 huge ones FTP-master rejected the first upload of the split packages saying among other things: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > - The included complete copy of the source *and* the existing i386 > binary is something that is really bad. Yes, we get in trouble if we > don't include the source for packages on the archive, but it is still > a *very* strong point against this packaging scheme. > We (as in ftp-team), but even more the security team are against them. and quotes from a mail he got: > 4/ Hard to handle for security team > > Those packages are not built from sources. This make them hard to handle > for the security team. One goal of the split is to actually simplify the handling. Currently all libs are combined in ia32-libs and ia32-libs-gtk and even noticing if any of them is affected by a maintainer or security upload is a problem. With the split packages there is a simple 1:1 mapping of the name so it is trivial to check if ia32-foo exists when foo is updated. Lets say zlib has a security upload: rmadison ia32-zlib ia32-zlib | 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-12+5 | unstable | source After seeing that ia32-zlib exists there are 2 ways to update the package. First you download the source, unpack it and go into the directory. Then you a) put the security repository into /etc/ia32-libs-tools/sources.list run 'debian/rules update' to fetch the latest source and debs (debian/changelog will be recreated from the security upload so it already has all the right info) or b) replace *deb, *dsc, *diff.gz and *.tar.gz with the new files add changelog entry with new version and finally you build the package using 'dpkg-buildpackage -aia64' or 'dpkg-buildpackage -aamd64' (if you aren't on one of those archs anyway). I hope you feel that this will simplify matters not just for us but also for you and will allow this package split continue. Hope to hear from you soon, Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]