Le March 10, 2008 04:24:22 pm Jim Popovitch, vous avez écrit : > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Filipus Klutiero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Debian is somewhat better than openSUSE, equal or slightly worst than > > Ubuntu and definitely worst than RHEL and derivatives. So on average, > > Debian is somewhat worst than its main alternatives in this aspect. > > On what data do you base the above claims?
On the text above the paragraph you quoted: > Let's take these 3 which are not too far from > Debian's quality: > RHEL and derivatives: 7 years > openSUSE: 2 years > Ubuntu: a bit more complex. > 1.5 in general > LTS releases: 3 on desktop, 5 on server ...and on the security support duration of Debian releases, approximately 2.5 to 3 years.
