I'm trying to understand the situation with the Debian Volatile package
of ClamAV and its lack of unrar support. I just found bug #465207 in
which Torsten Jerzembeck asked for the package to have the ability to
call unrar enabled - the maintainer replied that he is unable to do that
because the unrar code is not redistributable ...
But it seems to me that simply enabling the --unrar parameter of
clamscan would not entail incorporating or distributing any unrar code
at all - the code to parse the --unrar parameter and call the non-free
unrar binary if specified surely belongs to ClamAV alone ?
Thus the ClamAV package(s) could remain pure and free, while individual
sysadmins could make their own decision about whether to install the
non-free unrar binary package, and then request that clamscan call it.
I'm contemplating updating the bug report to say exactly this, but
wondering whether I'm missing something ... All opinions gratefully
received.
[We run clamscan nightly against a large amount of file storage used as
a Samba share by Windows-based engineers all around the UK - and they
seem to store a *lot* of RAR files there. I realise we could compile up
our own ClamAV, but I'd rather stick with Debian ...]
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/465207
Cheers
Nick Boyce
--
Microsoft suggests that users "do not open or save Word files"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
