From: "Sam Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 00:01:03 +0000 (UTC)
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:50:44 -0700, Robert Dobbs wrote:
>
> But it does not matter. I still get the same error on `apt-get update`:
>
> W: GPG error: http://security.debian.org stable/updates Release: The
> following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 010908312D230C5F Debian
Archive
> Automatic Signing Key (2006) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> W: GPG error: http://security.debian.org testing/updates Release: The
> following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 010908312D230C5F Debian
Archive
> Automatic Signing Key (2006) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Isn't BADSIG indicative of a bad signature rather than a missing key?
Yes, that's why it seemed like a problem with the server, and a good idea
initially to ask on this list, but I guess no one cares.
_________________________________________________________________
Check the weather nationwide with MSN Search: Try it now!
http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=weather&FORM=WLMTAG
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
