On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > When dealing with Debian matters of a technical nature, yes. When dealing > > with matters outside Debian, or of a non-technical nature, I may decide to > > not take such an instance. And frankly, as long as it is a rule of mine, > > applied to myself, what business is it of yours? > > Um, we're talking about a shared resource here which is designed to > help many people work together. changelogs are not some private > notations of the developer. It is certainly reasonable to expect that > they be maintained by different developers in a consistent way.
Ah, ok. You have convinced me that you have a valid reason to discuss editing past changelog entries, which is not what is happening in our last email exchanges in this thread. Or maybe you misinterpreted that I meant the entire *THREAD* about editing past changelog entries was useless? I wrote *subthread* for a reason. Let's go back to the real topic of this thread, outside of this useless subthread, shall we? I even happen to agree with you, a consistent way to deal with changelogs would be nice. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
