On 8/23/05, Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That is what stable is about: not changing, or when change is absolutely > necessary, changing as little as possible. A hot new Firefox release may > seem sexy to a Linux enthusiast, but to the novice, or to the corporate IS > administrator, it means risk.
This is a strawman argument: I haven't seen anybody write that they want a new release of Firefox because is "sexy". People want something, anything, that it is not as dangerous as the Firefox in stable. Whether that is a new release, the old release secured, no release at all or something else, is open to debate. But, please, do not deride people with opinions different than yours by bringing up non-existent arguments.
