this stuff can also be controlled using hosts.deny and hosts.allow. so then any inetd prog will do!
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 09:21:56AM +0200, Sebastiaan wrote: > Hello, > > I found out that rlinetd seems like a great replacement for inetd, because > it lets you choose which services may be available for the outside world > and which only for the inner network. So, standard services like echo, > daytime, chargen, ftp, etc. are only available for the LAN, while it is > not possible to connect to these ports from the internet. > > But, how secure is this? Is it really what it seems? > > Thanks in advance, > Sebastiaan > > > > -- > NT is the OS of the future. The main engine is the 16-bit Subsystem > (also called MS-DOS Subsystem). Above that, there is the windoze 95/98 > 16-bit Subsystem. Anyone can see that 16+16=32, so windoze NT is a > *real* 32-bit system. > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Jason Thomas Phone: +61 2 6257 7111 System Administrator - UID 0 Fax: +61 2 6257 7311 tSA Consulting Group Pty. Ltd. Mobile: 0418 29 66 81 1 Hall Street Lyneham ACT 2602 http://www.topic.com.au/
pgpacqYephpWx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
