On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 08:58:43PM +0200, Luis Gomez - InfoEmergencias wrote: > Other interesting things to look at: > > - LICENSING ISSUES. As Peter Cordes commented, the kernel is GPL so if we > integrate code into it, we cannot provide a binary-only version, we should > also give away the sources (or use modules, but we want a monolythic kernel > for obvious security reasons). However I don't see the problem in thinking of > something like this, implementing it, documenting, giving away to the > community... and later configuring it for our particular needs, so that a > client cannot (initially, at least) break it. >
I suppose if you used a BSD system, you could do this kernel modification and not have to provide the source. The userland side of the system is going to be very similar. Geoff Crompton -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
