Once again I ask, please do not use procmail or any other automated
system to report mail to razor that comes from a Debian list!!!

From: Andris Kalnozols <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: SNORT not adding entries to snort/portscan ???
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 18:25:47 PST
Delivery-date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 21:37:04 -0500
X-Razor-Warning: SPAM.

Regards,

Phil

On Sat, 30 Nov 2002 at 06:25:47PM -0800, Andris Kalnozols wrote:
> > Perhaps I did not state this clearly enough. The majority of cases
> > I run across are caused by an entirely unnecessary dependancy to
> > a version of libc6 which isn't in any way required for the package
> > in question. Yes, one can fix this manually. Every time, for every
> > package. Which naturally means you do it once or twice and then
> > say "oh forget it" and wait a year or whatever until the next stable
> > upgrade.
> > 
> > Package Dependencies on lib versions (or any other entity for that
> > matter)  really are several entirely different things:
> > 
> >     * the API changed and my application will fail with any
> >       lib version prior to this one because it relies on
> >       the changes.
> > 
> >     * bug fixes went into this lib version without which my
> >       app will crash.
> > 
> >     * bug fixes went into this version which I specifically
> >       want/prefer for my application, but it won't crash
> >       on the older one.
> > 
> >     * I just like to use the latest set of lib version digits
> >       for no particular reason.
> > 
> > I suspect the majority of package version dependencies fall into
> > the last category.
> > 
> > If this was dealt with, there would be a much higher level of
> > interoperability between packages in various dists. Still a 
> > caveat emptor, but far, far easier to deal with.
> 
> Is this an example of what you mean?
> 
>   /usr/sbin/sendmail: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.3' not found
>                     (required by /usr/sbin/sendmail)
> 
> After `apt-get' upgraded sendmail to 8.12.6, this error appeared.
> As I recall from another Debian list, the response from whoever
> compiled this version was something like "Oops, stuff happens
> in the testing distro" but, a month later, there's still no working
> replacement.  How does one go about fixing this kind of problem?
> 
> Andris
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

-- 
Phil

PGP/GPG Key:
http://www.zionlth.org/~plhofmei/
wget -O - http://www.zionlth.org/~plhofmei/key.txt | gpg --import
--
Excuse #41: Bank holiday - system operating credits not recharged 


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to