Andrea Frigido wrote:
Using stable - works fine. But I want to include crypto-patches from kerneli.org as well (offering me crypted loop-blockdevices)- and these patches seem to clash with the freeswan ones. I want both since freeswan offers more functionality right now.Alle 19:07, lunedì 18 novembre 2002, Lionel Elie Mamane ha scritto:On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 07:02:59PM +0100, Andrea Frigido wrote:kernel-patch-freeswan-ext UNSTABLE package or kernel-patch-freeswan STABLE package?This package exists only in unstable.Err... I've read a bit too fast. I didn't see you were comparing -ext in unstable and non-ext is stable.Do you think the unstable package is the better choice however?Yes. It tracks Freeswan stable releases, contains many bug fixes, etc. I use it and am happy with it.OK, now I install kernel-patch-freeswan-ext package, thanks :) It is compatible with kernel 2.4.18 or I need to use the kernel 2.4.19?
Anobody have a solution?
--
David J. M. Karlsen - +47 90 68 22 43
http://www.davidkarlsen.com
http://mp3.davidkarlsen.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
