> > > Wondering if some people know of some "content-aware" > proxies/filters, to > > attempt to block [some of] those dangerous products (apart > from maintaining > > a black-list...) > > Since the traffic is encrypted, content filtering > will not trigger. >
Thats true for HTTPS, not HTTP. And still, encrypted traffic could be filtered based on other criterias than content analysis. > > Certainly, it will always be possible to encapsulate > anything in HTML very > > sharply, but some filtering could be made still? > > If you allow traffic between the client and the > Internet at all, tunneling will always be > possible. Indeed. But i believe some things could be filtered in some cases, and are not. > > > (Maybe even run a browser on the proxy and have it check it > is able to > > display what goes through? sounds a bit freak, doesn't it?) > > Why do you allow people to install software on the > clients, if you don't trust them. > people do what they please. my job is [to try] to keep the network secure, in spite of users installing whatever. > - rk > > -- > These wheels are for inline skates only, unless you are stupid. > Aggressive skating can be dangerous and hazardous to your health. > If you get hurt, you are doing it wrong. > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]