> I have checked this and i am running the recommended version > nfs-common_0.1.9.1-1, also i don't see any obvious signs of access. Dose > this mean i don't need to worry about it or is there something else i > should be doing ? There is a bug in nfs-common_0.1.9.1 in Potato ( #111990 Hi,
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=111990&archive=yes&repeatmerged=yes ) This bug is NOT related to your problem (nor any security problem, except putting garbage in logcheck mails), but you may be interested. dists/potato/main/binary-sparc/net/nfs-kernel-server_0.1.9.1-1.deb dists/potato/main/binary-sparc/net/nfs-common_0.1.9.1-1.deb dists/potato/main/binary-i386/net/nfs-kernel-server_0.1.9.1-1.deb dists/potato/main/binary-i386/net/nfs-common_0.1.9.1-1.deb pool/main/n/nfs-utils/nfs-common_0.1.9.1-1.potato1_i386.deb pool/main/n/nfs-utils/nfs-common_0.1.9.1-1.potato1_sparc.deb pool/main/n/nfs-utils/nfs-kernel-server_0.1.9.1-1.potato1_i386.deb pool/main/n/nfs-utils/nfs-kernel-server_0.1.9.1-1.potato1_sparc.deb You should use nfs-common_0.1.9.1-1.potato1 to avoid this problem. Can somebody explain me why the replacement 0.1.9.1-1 -> 0.1.9.1-1.potato1 is not automatically done be apt ? My /etc/apt/source.list is: deb ftp://LOCAL_MIRROR/pub/debian stable main contrib non-free deb ftp://LOCAL_MIRROR/pub/debian-non-US stable/non-US main contrib non-free deb ftp://LOCAL_MIRROR/pub/debian-security stable/updates main contrib non-free (LOCAL_MIRROR is one of our boxes mirroring ftp.fr.debian.org and security.debian.org, just for our own needs). -- Benoît Sibaud R&D Engineer - France Telecom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
