On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, VERBEEK, FRANCOIS wrote:
> Well what you propose here is not exactly IPSec. It's an encrypted way to
>communicate but not IPSec. Don't expect it to work with a Cisco router/VPN
>concentrator or a Win2K machine.
> FreeSwan is quite a good product, quite inter-operable with all paltforms I tested
>it with. (It's been a while now, but I can find you the info about how I did it if
>you'd like).
>
>
I do not find FreeSwan good enough. FreeBSD(OpenBSD) implemetation seems
to me better. FreeSwan has serious problem with packet fragmentation
and setting MTU.
Thas why finaly gave up trying to use FreeSwan against other IPSEC
implemetations.
For few computers IPSEC is too robust. CIPE is easier to understand and
configure. I think that there is WIN NT implementation of CIPE.
Ivan Brezina
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
