On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 12:44:23PM +0100, Janusz A. Urbanowicz wrote:
> Petro wrote/napisa?[a]/schrieb:
> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 12:17:32PM +1100, Steve Smith wrote:
> > > 3DES is generally considered strong enough. However, it is slow, and
> > > can effect performance. Try doing large 'scp's and switch between
> > DES/3DES was designed to be implemented in hardware, doing a
> > software-only implementation is going to be slow.
> Current DES implementations aren't so slow, they reach millions of
> encryptions per sencond on current hardware.
It's relative. Encrypt x amount of data with 3des, do the same with
blowfish or one of the other AES canidates, using a comparable
keylength. Which is faster?
--
Share and Enjoy.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
