At 03:27 AM 4/6/2001 +0200, you wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 01:40:54PM -0700, Eric N. Valor wrote:
> >
> > I work from a default-deny stance.  Usual things to then allow in would be
> > 25 (smtp), 80 (http), 22 (ssh, although be careful here), 53-UDP (DNS, if
>
>This strickes me as odd, warning to be careful with ssd in the same
>sentence were http and bind are mentioned without any warnings.
>Or am I missing something?


Well, most folks like to connect to the Web, so port 80 is a must for that 
(it's 2-way on the same port).  53 is required only if you're running BIND 
so other servers can make information requests.  But I warned about SSH 
because unless you're checking logs or have some other reporting system 
it's a way for someone to brute-force into your system.  I've seen way too 
many bad username/password combinations and quite a lack of vigilance to 
not put up a warning.  Also, there was an exploit put out on BugTraq a 
while ago regarding SSH-1.  I use ssh on my external systems, but only 
where the security requirement is medium-low.  Even then I make it a point 
to keep my eye on the logs.  And an IDS isn't a bad idea, either.

--
Eric N. Valor
Webmeister/Inetservices
Lutris Technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

- This Space Intentionally Left Blank -


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to