On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 10:30:35AM -0700, Hubert Chan wrote: > > On the other hand, OpenSSH was created by the OpenBSD people, who are > famous for secure programming. > And also for quick security fixes. They had a patch for sudo about 5 hours after the recent bug was discovered. It took a few days for a fixed .deb to make it to security.debian.org. But maybe that's the difference between an OS that's usually updated through source patches, and one that usually uses precompiled binaries. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PS OpenSSH DOES go through the peer review/audit process. And if you want to disable DSA keys, well you can do that too, just read the manpage. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- SSH with potato, not very secure? Runar Bell
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Ethan Benson
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Richard
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Jacob Meuser
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Maarten Vink
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Hans Spaans
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Ethan Benson
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Hubert Chan
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Jacob Meuser
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Noah L. Meyerhans
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Runar Bell
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Tollef Fog Heen
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Jacob Meuser
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Kevin van Haaren
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Runar Bell
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Jacob Meuser
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Ethan Benson
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? William R. Ward
- Re: SSH with potato, not very secure? Tollef Fog Heen