On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 07:08:57PM +0100, Philippe BARNETCHE wrote: > I still don't understand how to handle with mutt the mails that have been pgp signed >with kmail. Are you talking about verifying signatures? I usually just pipe mine through gpg --verify... | gpg --verify Works for me. (There may be a better way... I know some ppl run messages through procmail first to give them the proper headers.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- ISPs offering ssl-encrypted e-mail? A . L . Meyers
- Re: ISPs offering ssl-encrypted e-mail? Antti Tolamo
- Re: ISPs offering ssl-encrypted e-mail? Philippe BARNETCHE
- Re: ISPs offering ssl-encrypted e-mail? Jim Breton
- Re: ISPs offering ssl-encrypted e-mail? A . L . Meyers
- Re: ISPs offering ssl-encrypted e-mail? Philippe BARNETCHE
- Re: ISPs offering ssl-encrypted e-mail? Matthew Sherborne
- Re: ISPs offering ssl-encrypted e-mail? A . L . Meyers
- Re: ISPs offering ssl-encrypted e-mail? Mike Renfro
- Re: ISPs offering ssl-encrypted e-mail? Matthew Sherborne
- Re: ISPs offering ssl-encrypted e-mail? Ethan Benson
- Re: ISPs offering ssl-encrypted e-mail? Peter Cordes
- Re: ISPs offering ssl-encrypted e-mail? Matthew Sherborne
- Re: ISPs offering ssl-encrypted e-mail? Ethan Benson