On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 05:27:07PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Of course plain md5 hashes are not very helpful. But we can keep MAC[1] for > binaries. Tampering with MAC database is useless. > > ... > > [1] Message Authentication Code. One of possible ways to compute MAC is > H(K,H(K,M)) where H is one-way hash function (MD5 or better SHA), K is key, M > is message (protected binary). Hey, I'm not very good at crypto; however, I was wondering what prevents the intruder from regenerating the MAC data-base (and what is the point of the double hashing you have stated as "H(K,H(K,M))"?). Sorry if off-topic (though a nice critical note would be fine). And don't forget to be gay (at least on Christmas), -- Pavel M. Penev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Debian audititing tool? Carey Evans
- Re: Debian audititing tool? Ethan Benson
- Re: Debian audititing tool? Peter Cordes
- Re: Debian audititing tool? Peter Eckersley
- Re: Debian audititing tool? dginsburg
- Re: Debian audititing tool? Rainer Weikusat
- Re: Debian audititing tool? Christian Kurz
- Re: Debian audititing tool? Christian Kurz
- Re: Debian audititing tool? Rainer Weikusat
- Re: Debian audititing tool? Christian Kurz
- Re: Debian audititing tool? Pavel Minev Penev
- Re: Debian audititing tool? Daniel Ginsburg
- Re: Debian audititing tool? Peter Cordes
- Re: Debian audititing tool? Christian Kurz
- Re: Debian audititing tool? Daniel Ginsburg
- Re: Debian audititing tool? David Wright
- Re: Debian audititing tool? Christian Kurz
- Re: Debian audititing tool? Peter Palfrader
- Re: Debian audititing tool? Christian Kurz
- Re: Debian audititing tool? Peter Palfrader
- Re: Debian audititing tool? Ethan Benson