On Wed, 1 Nov 2000 09:12:34 -0500 (EST) Patrick Maheral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Isn't there a provision in American (or Canadian) law that allows > reverse engineering (not disassembling code) for interoperability > purposes? Tell that to the DMCA, DeCSS, and the EFF. -- J C Lawrence Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------(*) Other: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Keys etc: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] --=| A man is as sane as he is dangerous to his environment |=-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: I want to try something for freedom. Penguin
- Re: I want to try something for freedom. Alexander Hvostov
- Re: I want to try something for freedom. Patrick Maheral
- Re: I want to try something for freedom. Hubert Chan
- Re: I want to try something for freedom. Robert Varga
- Re: I want to try something for freedom... Alexander Hvostov
- Re: I want to try something for fr... Robert Varga
- Re: I want to try something fo... Paul Haesler
- Re: I want to try something fo... Peter Cordes
- Re: I want to try something fo... Junk Mail
- Re: I want to try something for freedom. J C Lawrence
- Re: I want to try something for freedom. Samu
- Postfix is spammer-friendly by default on potat... Ingemar Fällman
- Re: Postfix is spammer-friendly by default ... Ethan Benson
- Re: Postfix is spammer-friendly by defa... Ingemar Fällman
- Re: Postfix is spammer-friendly by... Ethan Benson
- Re: Postfix is spammer-friendl... Borut Mrak
- Re: Postfix is spammer-friendl... Ethan Benson
- Re: Postfix is spammer-friendl... Borut Mrak
- Re: Postfix is spammer-friendl... Itai Zukerman
- Re: Postfix is spammer-friendl... Peter Palfrader