Hi Andreas, On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:00:55 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote > In case you did not noticed the Debian Science tasks scheme at > http://blends.alioth.debian.org/science/tasks > I would like you to have a look. It might make sense to create a new > task physics-hep if you consider packaging several programs.
I'd create a new task soon. > If I think this idea even further: Is it time to start a Debian > Physics Blend now. IMHO we have reached a critical mass of packages > which could be split into several reasonable categories. I second it, since Yann Pouillon is also preparing several packages of nanoscale physics [1]. > I - as a physicist of profession (but working not any more in this > field) - would definitely promote such a step (even if I say clearly > that Debian Med will remain my main focus). My speciality is theoretical high energy physics :-) For the license of Geant4, IMHO, the developers of Geant4 must know Free Software well and have solid reasons to draw a new license incompatible with the definition of FSF. Unless I had large contribution to Geant4, I'd not discuss the license issue with the authors. Personally, I'm not good at diplomatic things. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2010/10/msg00018.html Kind regards, - Lifeng -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110413132059.GA24231@localhost
