On 11 August 2015 at 21:22, Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 09:38:30 +0200, Tino Didriksen wrote: > > No transition is needed, and as upstream I would really prefer no > > transition is forced. > > As upstream why does the binary package name for the library matter to > you? Good point. I am also one of the package maintainers/uploaders, in addition to being upstream developer. We keep the various distro packaging scripts in our own repo and sync them to Debian as needed. I prefer having the same package names across all distros, barring wider policies (e.g. -dev vs -devel). Adding a v5 for just one platform would complicate our scripts and setup instructions. -- Tino Didriksen
-- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
