On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 09:38:30 +0200, Tino Didriksen wrote: > On 3 July 2015 at 15:12, Matthias Klose <d...@debian.org> wrote: > > > - Decide if the symbols matching __cxx11 or B5cxx11 are part of the > > library API, and are used by the reverse dependencies of the > > library. > > > > - If there are no reverse dependencies, it should be the package > > maintainers decision if a transition is needed. However this might > > break software which is not in the Debian archive, and built > > against these packages. > > > > No transition is needed, and as upstream I would really prefer no > transition is forced.
As upstream why does the binary package name for the library matter to you? Cheers, Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
