On 11/05/11 at 14:51 +0200, Vincent Fourmond wrote: > On 11/05/11 14:39, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > On 11/05/11 at 11:51 +0200, Vincent Fourmond wrote: > >> Does anyone object to integrate a support for setup.rb directly into > >> gem2deb (something similar to the old cdbs class) ? That would be a > >> second auto build system (say, ruby-setup.rb) that users should select > >> explicitly (to avoid changing the build behaviour). This would allow to > >> keep as much code in common for the ruby build and the ruby-setup.rb > >> build, and keep things as consistent as possible. > >> > >> I'd be glad to write it. > > > > Wouldn't it risk making the gem2deb code harder to maintain? > > I realize I've been much too vague in my last email, so here is my > proposition: > > * the setup.rb-supporting code would be integrated directly into > dh_ruby.rb, making it easy to share code > * it would be triggered only on a specific option, say --setup-rb > (that must come first of course). > > What do you say about that ?
That doesn't solve all the problems. You need to build for each ruby version, to install things at the proper places, etc. - lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110511125537.ga13...@xanadu.blop.info
