In data giovedì 20 ottobre 2016 13:49:55 CET, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha scritto: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 18/10/16 23:30, Pino Toscano wrote: > > In data lunedì 17 ottobre 2016 21:11:00 CEST, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha > > scritto: > >> On 08/10/16 20:34, Pino Toscano wrote: > >>> In data giovedì 6 ottobre 2016 10:25:57 CEST, Rene Engelhard ha scritto: > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 10:13:14PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > >>>>> This transition impacts the existing poppler libraries in the following > >>>>> ways: > >>>>> - libpoppler61 → libpoppler64 > >>>> [...] > >>>>> boomaga > >>>>> calligra > >>>>> cups-filters > >>>>> emacs-pdf-tools > >>>>> gambas3 > >>>>> gdal > >>>>> gdcm > >>>>> inkscape > >>>>> ipe-tools > >>>>> pdf2djvu > >>>>> pdf2htmlex > >>>>> popplerkit.framework > >>>>> texlive-bin > >>>>> texworks > >>>>> xpdf > >>>> > >>>> I believe there's stuff missing there for whatever reason. E.g. > >>>> libreoffice > >>>> (via libreoffice-pdfimport, > >>>> https://packages.debian.org/sid/libreoffice-pdfimport). > >>>> > >>>> Was in your last transition bugs afaicr, so I wonder what went wrong > >>>> this time ;) > >>> > >>> Oh right, sorry, it was indeed missing. In the above list there is also: > >>> > >>> libreoffice > >>> openscenegraph > >>> openscenegraph-3.4 > >> > >> I see the new poppler is now in experimental. Do the rdeps build against > >> the new > >> version? > > > > I could test everything but LibreOffice: no failures. > > > > Rene, could you please give LO + poppler/experimental a try? Thanks! > > Rene told me LO is fine. Please go ahead.
Sorry for the late reply -- I was busy and thus I couldn't dedicate the proper time to follow the transition. Is the slot for this transtition still open, or should I wait for any other in progress transitions? Thanks, -- Pino Toscano
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
