In data lunedì 17 ottobre 2016 21:11:00 CEST, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha scritto: > On 08/10/16 20:34, Pino Toscano wrote: > > In data giovedì 6 ottobre 2016 10:25:57 CEST, Rene Engelhard ha scritto: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 10:13:14PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > >>> This transition impacts the existing poppler libraries in the following > >>> ways: > >>> - libpoppler61 → libpoppler64 > >> [...] > >>> boomaga > >>> calligra > >>> cups-filters > >>> emacs-pdf-tools > >>> gambas3 > >>> gdal > >>> gdcm > >>> inkscape > >>> ipe-tools > >>> pdf2djvu > >>> pdf2htmlex > >>> popplerkit.framework > >>> texlive-bin > >>> texworks > >>> xpdf > >> > >> I believe there's stuff missing there for whatever reason. E.g. libreoffice > >> (via libreoffice-pdfimport, > >> https://packages.debian.org/sid/libreoffice-pdfimport). > >> > >> Was in your last transition bugs afaicr, so I wonder what went wrong this > >> time ;) > > > > Oh right, sorry, it was indeed missing. In the above list there is also: > > > > libreoffice > > openscenegraph > > openscenegraph-3.4 > > I see the new poppler is now in experimental. Do the rdeps build against the > new > version?
I could test everything but LibreOffice: no failures. Rene, could you please give LO + poppler/experimental a try? Thanks! -- Pino Toscano
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.