Dominic Hargreaves <d...@earth.li> writes: > From [2] it appears that work is underway to fix all this, by including > libdlm as a separate package. Presumably at this point lvm2 would not > depend on redhat-cluster and it could be removed from testing?
Yes, that's the plan. > As a more immediate fix - can the HA team comment on whether libccs-perl > has any value? Being built from the redhat-cluster source package, it will go when we remove redhat-cluster from the archive. Has it got any rdeps? > If not then perhaps that should just be dropped from the > redhat-cluster package ASAP [...] -- of course, since redhat-cluster > FTBFS, this would have to be done by the release team manually > removing (just) libccs-perl from testing. Is this feasible? I don't know if it's possible, but if yes: no objection from the HA team. -- Regards, Feri.
